Monday - Friday 09:00 - 5:00 PM
Saturday and Sunday - CLOSED
0330 001 0048
01522 904 420
Platelet Rich Plasma
Properly practised PRP treatment should be knowledge and evidence-based.
It is very important for the clinician to interpret studies relevant to the condition they are planning to treat and the preparation of the PRP they choose to prescribe. It is no different to any kind of medicine.
PRP - It's in our blood
Scientists around the world have been working on the treatment of joint pain and there are many approved substances designed specifically for joint injections.
Each person’s needs should be taken into account with their individual circumstances and at the same time each joint will have a specific environment and need.
Red Blood Cells
Platelet Rich Plasma
Safe loc system
Gel Separator 9500
What is PRP and how can it
treat MSK and Sports injuries?
Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) promises enhanced recovery from injuries.
However, it’s still an emerging treatment, it’s important to understand how it works and how to navigate the options on offer.
There are over 400 types of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) on the market and there are 10 medical articles relating to PRP every hour.
It is a rapidly evolving field of medicine. Over 10 level 1 randomised control trials (RCT) have confirmed the effectiveness of PRP, on the other hand, there are many studies reporting PRP being ineffective.
Effective treatment with PRP requires a solid understanding of the biology of the condition.
Although it is true to claim that PRP can treat a number of conditions, the devil is in the details when it comes to preparing the solution.
Steroid and cortisone for
Joint and MSK injury?
Many clinics offer joint injections; depending on the funding and the expertise of the practitioner, results vary. In the public sector, local anaesthetic and steroid mixtures are the commonest substances used for joint injections.
Although the toxic effects of this combination of drugs are well known and published in the scientific literature, it is still the treatment of choice in the public sector based purely on cost.
Most practitioners will take the one size fits all attitude of ‘we have always done it that way’ when it comes to MSK injections.
High concentrations of local anaesthetic and steroid are toxic to cartilage cells (chondrocytes), in fact, it is the substance that the scientists use in the lab if they want to kill these cells.
It makes little sense to inject such a high concentration of toxic substances to an enclosed environment such as the knee joint. Perhaps the objective is to ‘kill’ the cells and nerve endings so it will not be painful anymore.
How did PRP emerge as a treatment for MSK injury?
It is a known fact that there are growth factors and other signalling molecules such as cytokines in our blood. Due to its properties, blood serum has been used to treat many medical conditions for over 50 years.
PRP stands for platelet-rich plasma. Essentially it is the technique of separating and concentrating the useful substances that you find in your own blood, then injecting this into the area we want to treat.
What do we mean by “useful substances” in PRP?
It depends on the condition we’re trying to treat. Some substances in the blood are ideal for improving the quality of your skin and making it look more youthful.
Other substances can help to repair the cartilage in your knee and some can help ligament to heal.
It is therefore essential to extract the right substances for the right condition.
As a result, the PRP that we use to treat knee osteoarthritis, for example, is different to the PRP we use to treat acute meniscus tear or shoulder injuries.
Depending on the time, speed and size of the machine, different types of PRP can be produced.
What’s the current evidence base for this treatment?
Due to recent advances in medicine and the increased interest in biological solutions, the medical literature has expanded over a thousand times on the topic in PRP.
There are now more than 5,000 methods to produce PRP, so it is very difficult to compare evidence across all of the studies.
There are many level 1 RCT clinical studies suggesting that it has great effects but, at the same time, there are also level 1 studies saying it has no effects.
To complicate matters, meta-analyses (where we group the results of several studies together) conclude that PRP makes no difference.
This is no surprise, since each PRP treatment is different – grouping it all together makes no sense and will not produce a useful conclusion.
It is like saying that antibiotic medication is not effective against infection. It certainly can be, as long as it is the right medication!